Where are results of rtems-tester test results archived?

[dufault at hda.com]

> On Sep 21, 2019, at 17:49 , <dufault at hda.com> <dufault at hda.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 21, 2019, at 16:41 , Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 22/9/19 1:18 am, dufault at hda.com wrote:
>>>> On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault <dufault at hda.com> wrote:
>>>> I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere.  I’d like to see the results of the tests on all architectures to compare to what I see on PowerPC-beatnik.
>>>> 
>>>> There is a build@ mailing list and the archives are at https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/
>>>> 
>>>> There should be results from at least me for psim.
>>>> 
>>>> You are encouraged to subscribe to the list and post results. Many boards have no results.
>>>> 
>>> That doesn’t look like what I want.  I’m looking for something like the following (a small snippet of my test run in progress) to see what failures are shared by what board support packages.
>>> 
>>> [141/597] p:128 f:7   u:2   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: telnetd01.exe
>>> [142/597] p:129 f:7   u:2   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios.exe
>>> [143/597] p:129 f:7   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios01.exe
>>> [144/597] p:129 f:8   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios02.exe
>>> [145/597] p:129 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios03.exe
>>> [146/597] p:130 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios04.exe
>>> [147/597] p:131 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios05.exe
>> 
>> The --log option should place all the test results in a log. Is that what you want?
>> 
>> There are other options that let you log the console data as well. This is
>> disabled by default to make the log more compact.
>> 
> 
> I want a collection of results for all tested BSPs so that I can compare what I’m seeing with “beatnik” with others.
> 
> I thought there was a collection of systems that went through automated tests, an RTEMS testing lab of sorts.  Am I confused?  I was ready to try to get an MVME5500 and whatever else was needed to the lab.
> 
Beatnik finished:
[595/597] p:563 f:19  u:6   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:1   i:2   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: tmonetoone.exe
[596/597] p:564 f:19  u:6   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:1   i:2   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: tmoverhd.exe
[597/597] p:565 f:19  u:6   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:1   i:2   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: tmtimer01.exe
Passed:        565
Failed:         20
User Input:      6
Expected Fail:   0
Indeterminate:   0
Benchmark:       3
Timeout:         1
Invalid:         2
Wrong Version:   0
Wrong Build:     0
Wrong Tools:     0
------------------
Total:         597
Average test time: 0:00:20.652608
Testing time     : 3:25:29.607257
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "../rtems-tools/tester/rt/cmd-test.py", line 42, in <module>
    test.run(sys.argv[1:], command_path = base)
  File "/home/dufault/development/rtems/rtems-tools/tester/rt/test.py", line 455, in run
    for report_format in report_formats:
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable

Peter
-----------------
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering

This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering.