Where are results of rtems-tester test results archived?

[Gedare Bloom]

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:41 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 10:18 AM <dufault at hda.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault <dufault at hda.com> wrote:
>> > I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere.  I’d like to see the results of the tests on all architectures to compare to what I see on PowerPC-beatnik.
>> >
>> > There is a build@ mailing list and the archives are at https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/
>> >
>> > There should be results from at least me for psim.
>> >
>> > You are encouraged to subscribe to the list and post results. Many boards have no results.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> That doesn’t look like what I want.  I’m looking for something like the following (a small snippet of my test run in progress) to see what failures are shared by what board support packages.
>>
>> [141/597] p:128 f:7   u:2   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: telnetd01.exe
>> [142/597] p:129 f:7   u:2   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios.exe
>> [143/597] p:129 f:7   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios01.exe
>> [144/597] p:129 f:8   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios02.exe
>> [145/597] p:129 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios03.exe
>> [146/597] p:130 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios04.exe
>> [147/597] p:131 f:9   u:3   e:0   I:0   B:3   t:0   i:0   W:0   | powerpc/beatnik: termios05.exe
>
>
> Most are for tools builds. I have a script I run periodically which includes tools and bsps. This is a psim results post: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2019-August/002973.html
>
> It shows the failures but still doesn't show the in process view. Does that help at all?
>
Just to jump in, as I recall the "in process" view is not always
useful, since it does not exactly tell you what has failed (when you
run several tests in parallel, that is).  Collecting the end results
of could be nice. Automating this and creating a colored status matrix
would be a nice little project for someone.

> FWIW I haven't investigated the 15 failures on psim.
>
> --joel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter
>> -----------------
>> Peter Dufault
>> HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering
>>
>> This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel