Failures on Overnight build sweep
Hesham Almatary
hesham.almatary at cl.cam.ac.uk
Sun Apr 5 20:13:23 UTC 2020
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 21:00, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 2:54 PM Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 20:31, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > RTEMS is using this hash: 50782bc5cf00bbaa3ac5200009c6a901f7a52905
>> > RSB is using this hash: 113c65cb56d04c59a0e145f85864fb431419dfa9
>> >
>> > I can see a couple of fairly obvious odd issues beyond probably missing
>> > the patches you mention:
>> >
>> > + dtc is older as an RSB recipe by itself than when built with Spike
>> >
>> > + spike doesn't build on FreeBSD
>> >
>> We may pull this patch in RSB to build Spike on FreeBSD
>> https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/riscv-isa-sim/pull/7/
>
>
> Hesham, can you update the Spike RSB to do that?
>
Unfortunately I don't have a FreeBSD box to test on. I can test it on
Linux, but I won't build if it works on FreeBDS or not.
> And it shouldn't take much time while you are there to bump the dtc
> to the same as in the spike recipe.
>
> Please and thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > + GDB build issue with iconv on FreeBSD 12.
>> >
>> > + Did the atsamv issue where it couldn't link all rtems-libbsd tests get fixed?
>> >
>> > It takes a while to dig through the failures. I trust the failures on Centos and
>> > Ubuntu to be RTEMS related while the FreeBSD ones tend to be in tools.
>> > And that triggers more not working.
>> >
>> > --joel
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 2:04 PM Christian Mauderer <oss at c-mauderer.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Joel,
>> >>
>> >> libbsd on raspberry should work again since yesterday (if you refer to
>> >> that ticket: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3903).
>> >>
>> >> Did your build already include the revert here:
>> >> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=d582d0e130a463842e27070a2e85ebc1acc7b71f
>> >>
>> >> Sebastian reverted it after Chris said that it broke some builds:
>> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059014.html
>> >>
>> >> Best regards
>> >>
>> >> Christian
>> >>
>> >> On 05/04/2020 18:28, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > It will take me some time to go through all the failures reported on my
>> >> > overnight sweep (which isn't finished everywhere) for Centos 7, Ubuntu,
>> >> > and FreeBSD.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please try to look at the failure messages at
>> >> >
>> >> > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2020-April/date.html
>> >> >
>> >> > And see if you can help identify the various root causes and fix them.
>> >> >
>> >> > It appears that a number of the BSP bsets do not build to completion
>> >> > on Centos, many things fail on FreeBSD 12, etc. For example, this
>> >> > for the PC BSP bset on CentOS:
>> >> >
>> >> > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2020-April/012862.html
>> >> >
>> >> > The rasperrypi2 bset build failure is well-known and has a ticket.
>> >> >
>> >> > Help is really appreciated triaging and fixing these.
>> >> >
>> >> > --joel
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > devel mailing list
>> >> > devel at rtems.org
>> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel at rtems.org
>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the devel
mailing list