Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

Tue Apr 7 13:31:21 UTC 2020

On 07/04/2020 15:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:

>     > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see
>     > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of
>     what
>     > works is important.
>     The BSP runs on the evaluation board with default options.
>
>
> But it doesn't build to completion? Why would someone assume a build that
> fails produces a working set of exes?
I didn't claim that the libbsd build system is perfect. The libbsd works 
fine if you have a board with enough RAM. The evaluation board has only 
2MiB of SDRAM. This is simply not enough for the standard tests.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200407/03e77f20/attachment.html>