Build Linux: FAILED 5/bsps/atsamv on x86_64-linux-gnu (rtems-libbsd-v816a2f912f414f39467a6be901a96159f806c01d-x86_64-linux-gnu-1)

[Sebastian Huber]

On 07/04/2020 15:31, Sebastian Huber wrote:

> On 07/04/2020 15:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>     > ... The README says "Not all variants are tested" but I cannot see
>>     > what has been tested? When you are new to a BSP a valid list of
>>     what
>>     > works is important.
>>     The BSP runs on the evaluation board with default options.
>>
>>
>> But it doesn't build to completion? Why would someone assume a build that
>> fails produces a working set of exes?
> I didn't claim that the libbsd build system is perfect. The libbsd 
> works fine if you have a board with enough RAM. The evaluation board 
> has only 2MiB of SDRAM. This is simply not enough for the standard tests.
This BSP and the libbsd build system are not good enough right now to 
add this BSP to an RSB build set. I should have tested this before I 
added it. This was a mistake.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200407/b6a52dd5/attachment-0001.html>