[PATCH 8/8] libtest: Change T_step() and T_assert_step()
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Thu Aug 13 10:11:33 UTC 2020
Normally, the expected test step must be a compile time constant. Allow
variable expected test steps for the T_step() and T_assert_step(). This
can be used in for parameterized test loops with individual fixtures.
Remove the ability to use custom failure messages due to some
implementation constraints.
Update #3199.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/test.h | 17 +++++++++++------
cpukit/libtest/t-test.c | 11 +++++++++++
testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-destructor.c | 2 +-
testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-plan.c | 6 +++---
testsuites/smptests/smpmulticast01/init.c | 16 ++++++++--------
5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/test.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/test.h
index 95e078ceff..ccab6c4a95 100644
--- a/cpukit/include/rtems/test.h
+++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/test.h
@@ -2168,12 +2168,17 @@ void T_check_rsc_success(const T_check_context *, uint32_t);
void T_plan(unsigned int);
-#define T_step(...) \
- T_flags_true(T_CHECK_STEP(T_VA_ARGS_FIRST(__VA_ARGS__)), \
- true T_VA_ARGS_MORE(__VA_ARGS__))
-#define T_step_assert(...) \
- T_flags_true(T_CHECK_STEP(T_VA_ARGS_FIRST(__VA_ARGS__)) | T_CHECK_STOP, \
- true T_VA_ARGS_MORE(__VA_ARGS__))
+void T_check_step(const T_check_context *, unsigned int);
+
+#define T_flags_step(a, flags) \
+{ \
+ static const T_check_context T_check_instance = { \
+ T_FILE_NAME, __LINE__, (flags) | T_CHECK_FMT }; \
+ T_check_step(&T_check_instance, a); \
+}
+
+#define T_step(e) T_flags_step(e, 0)
+#define T_step_assert(e) T_flags_step(e, T_CHECK_STOP)
/**
* @defgroup RTEMSTestFrameworkTime Time Services
diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/t-test.c b/cpukit/libtest/t-test.c
index 306f9439c4..c12b2d4f41 100644
--- a/cpukit/libtest/t-test.c
+++ b/cpukit/libtest/t-test.c
@@ -550,6 +550,17 @@ void T_plan(unsigned int planned_steps)
expected);
}
+void
+T_check_step(const T_check_context *t, unsigned int expected)
+{
+ T_check_context tt;
+
+ tt = *t;
+ tt.flags |= T_CHECK_STEP(expected);
+ T_check(&tt, true, "actual step is not equal to expected step (%u)",
+ expected);
+}
+
void
T_case_register(T_case_context *tc)
{
diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-destructor.c b/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-destructor.c
index 71b14c08f6..0a2f650ed2 100644
--- a/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-destructor.c
+++ b/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-destructor.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ static void
destroy(T_destructor *dtor)
{
(void)dtor;
- T_step(0, "destroy");
+ T_step(0);
}
T_TEST_CASE(destructor)
diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-plan.c b/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-plan.c
index 155704c478..4a550f34fa 100644
--- a/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-plan.c
+++ b/testsuites/libtests/ttest01/test-plan.c
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@ T_TEST_CASE(double_plan)
T_TEST_CASE(steps)
{
- T_step(0, "a");
+ T_step(0);
T_plan(3);
- T_step(1, "b");
- T_step(2, "c");
+ T_step(1);
+ T_step(2);
}
#include "t-self-test.h"
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpmulticast01/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smpmulticast01/init.c
index b6ee9f93cc..f5ed70952a 100644
--- a/testsuites/smptests/smpmulticast01/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smpmulticast01/init.c
@@ -432,17 +432,17 @@ static Per_CPU_Job job_order_jobs[TEST_JOB_ORDER_JOBS];
static void job_order_handler_0(void *arg)
{
- T_step(1, "invalid job order");
+ T_step(1);
}
static void job_order_handler_1(void *arg)
{
- T_step(2, "invalid job order");
+ T_step(2);
}
static void job_order_handler_2(void *arg)
{
- T_step(3, "invalid job order");
+ T_step(3);
}
static const Per_CPU_Job_context job_order_contexts[TEST_JOB_ORDER_JOBS] = {
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ T_TEST_CASE(JobOrder)
_Per_CPU_Add_job(cpu_self, &job_order_jobs[i]);
}
- T_step(0, "wrong job processing time");
+ T_step(0);
_SMP_Send_message(_Per_CPU_Get_index(cpu_self), SMP_MESSAGE_PERFORM_JOBS);
_Thread_Dispatch_enable(cpu_self);
}
@@ -475,13 +475,13 @@ static Per_CPU_Job add_job_in_job_jobs[TEST_ADD_JOB_IN_JOB_JOBS];
static void add_job_in_job_handler_0(void *arg)
{
- T_step(1, "invalid job order");
+ T_step(1);
_Per_CPU_Add_job(_Per_CPU_Get(), &add_job_in_job_jobs[1]);
}
static void add_job_in_job_handler_1(void *arg)
{
- T_step(3, "invalid job order");
+ T_step(3);
}
static const Per_CPU_Job_context
@@ -503,9 +503,9 @@ T_TEST_CASE(AddJobInJob)
}
_Per_CPU_Add_job(cpu_self, &add_job_in_job_jobs[0]);
- T_step(0, "wrong job processing time");
+ T_step(0);
_SMP_Send_message(_Per_CPU_Get_index(cpu_self), SMP_MESSAGE_PERFORM_JOBS);
- T_step(2, "wrong job processing time");
+ T_step(2);
_SMP_Send_message(_Per_CPU_Get_index(cpu_self), SMP_MESSAGE_PERFORM_JOBS);
_Thread_Dispatch_enable(cpu_self);
}
--
2.26.2
More information about the devel
mailing list