qemu5 and zynq console input

[Joel Sherrill]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 10:30 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke
>> with the
>> > qemu version bump in the RSB.
>>
>> I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input.
>>
>> Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ work? It
> could be an interesting project to get even one input-related test running
> under automation.
>

This might be a good GSoC project. Hard part might be associating test
scripts with executables.

What if we want more than one? Seems likely if the shell is going to be
exercised thoroughly.

>
>
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201201/b68bd3d5/attachment-0001.html>