qemu5 and zynq console input

[Gedare Bloom]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 10:30 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke
>>> with the
>>> > qemu version bump in the RSB.
>>>
>>> I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input.
>>>
>>> Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ work? It
>> could be an interesting project to get even one input-related test running
>> under automation.
>>
>
> This might be a good GSoC project. Hard part might be associating test
> scripts with executables.
>
> What if we want more than one? Seems likely if the shell is going to be
> exercised thoroughly.
>

Induction. :)


>
>>
>>> Chris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at rtems.org
>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201201/7a65ea9d/attachment.html>