qemu5 and zynq console input
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Dec 1 21:06:49 UTC 2020
On 2/12/20 3:29 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
>
> On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke
> with the
> > qemu version bump in the RSB.
>
> I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input.
>
> Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> <https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/> work?
Yes it would and it is small enough to be included.
> It could be an interesting
> project to get even one input-related test running under automation.
It would be and this failure highlights a weakness in the rtems-test command.
I would need to see where in the runtime I would place input processing and if
the input side would need an extra thread.
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list