qemu5 and zynq console input

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Dec 1 21:06:49 UTC 2020


On 2/12/20 3:29 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:59 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On 1/12/20 10:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>     > Does this combination work for anyone? I am suspicious that this broke
>     with the
>     > qemu version bump in the RSB.
> 
>     I did not test input. The tester does not have the ability to test input.
> 
> Would something like https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> <https://pexpect.readthedocs.io/en/stable/> work?

Yes it would and it is small enough to be included.

> It could be an interesting
> project to get even one input-related test running under automation.

It would be and this failure highlights a weakness in the rtems-test command.

I would need to see where in the runtime I would place input processing and if
the input side would need an extra thread.

Chris


More information about the devel mailing list