Enabling Buildbot 'responsible user' emails.

[Amar Takhar]

On 2020-02-07 16:17 +1100, Chris Johns wrote:
> 
> Could we build an "always must build" BSP and if it builds a wider selection are
> built? The beaglebone black is my pick.

That's the way it already works now and has for years.

Look at the waterfall the process is:

  1. Build snapshot
  2. Build sparc/erc32
  3. If #2 passes trigger <all builds>
  4. If #3 passes build "stable" snapshot.

You can see this by viewing: https://buildbot.rtems.org/#/waterfall and looking 
at the timeline to see the order.


> This would avoid a issue in the common code or buildbot needing updated tools
> from generating the same message a number of times.

Yes again it already works this way and has for the last 6 years. :)


> Note, it cannot be a SPARC BSP because it is not a tier 1 architecture as no
> hardware test results has been published <hint hint>.

No idea nobody has ever mentioned anything and it's clear on Buildbot that the 
CHECK BSP is what is used... this is what was given to me a very long time ago.

Which one should it be now?  Can everyone agree one one?


Amar.