Suggestion about libdl's cache size

[jameszxj]

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Chris Johns"<chrisj at rtems.org>;
Date: Mon, Feb 10, 2020 09:52 AM
To: "jameszxj"<jameszxj at gmail.com>;"devel"<devel at rtems.org>;

Subject: Re: Suggestion about libdl's cache size



On 10/2/20 12:14 pm, jameszxj wrote:
> >    The caches size(RTEMS_RTL_ELF_SYMBOL_CACHE ...) now are just define in rtl.c.
>
> Yes.
>
> > One of our project should increase the cache size, so I have to modify the
> > kernel source file directly. I think if the cache size can be redefined maybe
> > friendly.
>
> Yes I agree. When libdl was written I provided the flexibility to set the cache
> size however I never created a formal interface to do this. At the time there
> were many other things that needed to be resolved before this. I felt if this
> was important and needed it would be raised as an issue. It looks like that time
> as come.
expecting.

> If you would something added please contact me offline.
OK, Thanks.

> Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200210/883e6622/attachment.html>