Remove support for RTEMS_SCHEDSIM?
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Fri Feb 14 15:57:26 UTC 2020
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14/02/2020 16:31, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:04 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> On 14/02/2020 15:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> > I guess it is time to kill it.
>>
>> I already have a smoking gun in my hands. I think it would be possible
>> to make it working again with some effort. However, it is quite easy to
>> add scheduler test scenarios in the RTEMS test suite itself, for example:
>>
>>
>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02/init.c#n108
>
>
> The simulator allowed you to instance any number of cores in a system and
> reduce the testing to just the scheduling events -- no interrupts, no
> hardware,
> no device drivers, and native debug environment.
>
> You can easily construct a system with 2, 4, 8, 32, or 64 nodes with it.
> It is
> more flexible and really much simpler to debug with when developing a
> scheduler.
>
> Ok, this is difficult with real hardware. If there is a need, we can make
> it work again.
>
Yeah. This is why I wrote it. A 10 line script translated into 100s of
lines of test code
and was more painful to debug.
But we aren't writing schedulers like we were a few years ago.
--joel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200214/d1da8c62/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list