[PATCH] Fix a minor "suspect" -> "subject" wording error

[Chris Johns]

Pushed.

Thanks
Chris

On 22/2/20 10:17 pm, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> ---
> The word "suspect" here looked like a mistake and I have changed it
> based on this assumption.
> 
> If it is not a mistake, what does "suspect" mean in this context?
> 
>  c-user/self_contained_objects.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst b/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst
> index a581e0e..1c1e664 100644
> --- a/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst
> +++ b/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ has some weaknesses:
>  * The object identifier is only known at run-time.  This hinders compiler
>    optimizations and static analysis.
>  
> -* The objects reside in a table, e.g. they are suspect to false sharing of
> +* The objects reside in a table, e.g. they are subject to false sharing of
>    cache lines :cite:`Drepper:2007:Memory`.
>  
>  * The object operations use a rich set of options and attributes.  For each
>