Need help in understanding some of the existing code in RTEMS
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Thu Jul 16 15:47:33 UTC 2020
On 15/07/2020 14:55, Richi Dubey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:57 PM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com
> <mailto:richidubey at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a small question. The scheduler struct inside percpu.h looks
> like:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> struct {
> /**
> * @brief The scheduler control of the scheduler owning this
> processor.
> *
> * This pointer is NULL in case this processor is currently
> not used by a
> * scheduler instance.
> */
> const struct _Scheduler_Control *control;
>
> /**
> * @brief The scheduler context of the scheduler owning this
> processor.
> *
> * This pointer is NULL in case this processor is currently
> not used by a
> * scheduler instance.
> */
> const struct Scheduler_Context *context;
>
> /**
> * @brief The idle thread for this processor in case it is
> online and
> * currently not used by a scheduler instance.
> */
> struct _Thread_Control *idle_if_online_and_unused;
> } Scheduler;
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> So, does this mean a CPU when active is always either executing an
> idle thread and is not being used by a scheduler (so has a thread
> attribute in the idle_if_online_and_unused), or is used by a
> scheduler and is executing a task ( which can not be an idle
> task)? Another equivalent question is do we have an idle scheduler
> node, like we have idle predefined threads that run on a CPU?
>
During system startup the application configuration defines which
processor is available to RTEMS. Every configured and present processor
gets an idle thread assigned which is managed by a scheduler. This is
the starting point of the system. If someone calls
rtems_scheduler_remove_processor(), then a processor gets removed from a
scheduler instance. This processor still has to execute code. For this a
idle thread is used. This idle thread is not managed by a scheduler. If
someone uses rtems_scheduler_add_processor() this idle thread is again
controlled by a scheduler.
More information about the devel
mailing list