[PATCH v3] Changed ARM fenv support similar to X86_64

[Eshan Dhawan]

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:32 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:39 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 18-Jul-2020, at 8:51 PM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18/07/2020 17:17, Eshan Dhawan wrote:
> > >
> > >>>>> On 18-Jul-2020, at 4:52 PM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> > >>>> Hello Eshan,
> > >>>> you produce a lot of extra work for me. Your patch applies now. But
> it didn't build:
> > >>>> make[9]: *** No rule to make target 'fenv-vfp.c', needed by
> 'lib_a-fenv-vfp.o'.  Stop.
> > >>>> make[9]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > >>>> make[9]: Leaving directory
> '/build/git-build/b-gcc-10.1.0-arm-rtems5/arm-rtems5/thumb/newlib/libm/machine/arm'
> > >> Fenv-vpf.c file was deleted as well as the declarations were deleted
> from makefile.am
> > >> So it shouldn’t be compiled
> > >> Did you try Remaking the autoconf files after applying the patch ???
> > >> This patch have the autoconf files
> > > I don't want to run autoconf myself to test your patches. Please
> include the build system changes in your patches.
> > Apologies, I will add the autoconf files from future patches.
>
> auto* generated output is included for newlib patches, but not for
> rtems. We don't keep the generated files in our repo.
>
We don't have to send the auto generated files  in the patch sent to newlib
as well
They are generated by the maintainers there.
So ,I forgot to send in rtems version of the patch as well. Apologies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200718/b5e1671b/attachment.html>