[GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures
mritunjaysharma394 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 00:34:25 UTC 2020
Hi Chris and Joel,
Thanks for the discussion!
Please find the patch for PC for EPICS here
As an experiment, in the 4 patches I have sent to devel for RSB recipe a few days pack, I worked on a local file. I will modify it to published source soon in the next version of patch.
There are a few corrections in the blog that I have to make and then republish. It’s a bit late here in India now and I am a bit sleepy. Please if you don’t mind can I send the blog link in around 6-7 hrs from now?
From: Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 5:35:59 AM
To: joel at rtems.org <joel at rtems.org>; Mritunjay Sharma <mritunjaysharma394 at gmail.com>
Cc: rtems-devel at rtems.org <devel at rtems.org>
Subject: Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures
On 27/7/20 9:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma <mritunjaysharma394 at gmail.com
> <mailto:mritunjaysharma394 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello all,
> To update you all, I have sent the first version of PATCHES that
> implement an RSB recipe for EPICS7 building with RTEMS5 for pc-386.
> While the build was successful for pc-386, I have doubts and need
> suggestions on how to make it work across different BSP targets.
> I will request Chris to show me the path and if possible then also review
> the patches.
> I didn't see anything in the patches that look to be pc specific but admit I
> could have missed something.
There is a patch to EPICS for the PC BSP that I cannot find posted online anywhere.
> I would try another couple of BSPs known to work with EPICS
> using the same network stack you used for the PC. Options include:
> + powerpc and beatnik or a motorola_powerpc variant
> + arm zynq qemu
> + m68k uc5282
> Which network stack did you build against?
It currently is the legacy stack. Heinz has changes pending for RTEMS 5.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel