[PATCH v7] tests for fenv.h functions

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Sun Mar 22 14:14:12 UTC 2020


On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 3:59 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:21 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is
>> successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems
>> tests.
>>
> I will incorporate more changes to the test so there is minimal printing if the test is successful
> The test is originally written by @Vaibhav Gupta
> it would require to do minor changes in the previous parts of the test as well
> should i do that ??
Yes that would be good.

>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture.
>> > The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error
>> > while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct value defined in
>> > rtems_test_assert().
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel at rtems.org
>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


More information about the devel mailing list