[PATCH v7] tests for fenv.h functions

Eshan Dhawan eshandhawan51 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 09:59:37 UTC 2020


On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:21 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is
> successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems
> tests.
>
> I will incorporate more changes to the test so there is minimal printing
if the test is successful
The test is originally written by @Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek at gmail.com>

it would require to do minor changes in the previous parts of the test as
well
should i do that ??

> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture.
> > The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error
> > while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct
> value defined in
> > rtems_test_assert().
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200322/6e72be19/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list