ticket #3372 Add tests for inttypes.h methods to RTEMS

[Eshan Dhawan]

I have sent a patch related to it for adding methods
link : https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058727.html

-Eshan

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 3:07 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:36 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 3:46 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawan51 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I went through the currently available tests
>>> they lack the test for functions
>>> •imaxabs()
>>> • imaxdiv()
>>> Please tell that If any other function whose test is to be added.
>>>
>> Test for other functions were already written last year by @Vaibhav Gupta
> <vaibhav.varodek at gmail.com>
> Only these 2 are left for inttypes.h
> I will send a patch for the two methods test I think in a way could be
> implemented.
> Since they don't have any exceptions so I thought of directly verifying
> the result.
> I will go through the sources for tests as well.
>
>>
>> If we knew, there would either be tests or tickets. :)
>>
>> File a ticket with the appropriate tags to have it show up in the POSIX
>> compliance list and add it to your project if you like.
>>
>> On a vaguely related note, there is the open POSIX test suite (
>> http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/) and glibc's test suite. In theory
>> they should be able to run against RTEMS. In practice, I have no idea if or
>> how hard it would be to get them to run and to investigate failures to mark
>> some as expected. Some test frameworks assume fork and exec. Just throwing
>> this out.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Eshan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at rtems.org
>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200330/f54971a8/attachment.html>