[PATCH] eng: Update requirements tooling section
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Fri May 29 07:19:14 UTC 2020
Update #3715.
---
eng/req/tooling.rst | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eng/req/tooling.rst b/eng/req/tooling.rst
index 9c175fc..28461e9 100644
--- a/eng/req/tooling.rst
+++ b/eng/req/tooling.rst
@@ -80,11 +80,11 @@ Doorstop consists of three main parts
* a primitive GUI tool (not intended to be used).
-For RTEMS, its scope will be extended to manage specifications in general. The
-primary reason for selecting Doorstop as the requirements management tool for
-the RTEMS Project is its data format which allows a high degree of
-customization. Doorstop uses a directed, acyclic graph (DAG) of items. The
-items are files in YAML format. Each item has a set of
+For RTEMS, its scope could be extended to manage specifications in general.
+The primary reason for a close consideration of Doorstop as the requirements
+management tool for the RTEMS Project was its data format which allows a high
+degree of customization. Doorstop uses a directed, acyclic graph (DAG) of
+items. The items are files in YAML format. Each item has a set of
`standard attributes <https://doorstop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/item/>`_
(key-value pairs).
@@ -92,16 +92,17 @@ The use case for the standard attributes is requirements management. However,
Doorstop is capable to manage custom attributes as well. We will heavily use
custom attributes for the specification items. Enabling Doorstop to effectively
use custom attributes was done specifically for the RTEMS Project in several
-patch sets.
+patch sets which in the end turned out to be not enough to use Doorstop for the
+RTEMS Project.
A key feature of Doorstop is the `fingerprint of items
<https://doorstop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/item/#reviewed>`_.
For the RTEMS Project, the fingerprint hash algorithm was changed from MD5 to
SHA256. In 2019, it can be considered cryptographically secure. The
fingerprint should cover the normative values of an item, e.g. comments etc. are
-not included. The fingerprint helps RTEMS users to track the significant
-changes in the requirements (in contrast to all the changes visible in Git). As
-an example use case, a user may want to assign a project-specific status to
+not included. The fingerprint would help RTEMS users to track the significant
+changes in the requirements (in contrast to all the changes visible in Git).
+As an example use case, a user may want to assign a project-specific status to
specification items. This can be done with a table which contains columns for
1. the UID of the item,
@@ -115,8 +116,8 @@ table, it can be determined which items are unchanged and which have another
status (e.g. unknown, changed, etc.).
After some initial work with Doorstop some issues surfaced
-(`#471 <https://github.com/doorstop-dev/doorstop/issues/471>`_)
-It turned out that Doorstop is not designed as a library and contains to much
+(`#471 <https://github.com/doorstop-dev/doorstop/issues/471>`_).
+It turned out that Doorstop is not designed as a library and contains too much
policy. This results in a lack of flexibility required for the RTEMS Project.
1. Its primary use case is requirements management. So, it has some standard
@@ -147,3 +148,13 @@ policy. This results in a lack of flexibility required for the RTEMS Project.
example, we want to use specification items for a new build system. Here it
is handy if you can express things like this: A is composed of B and C.
Build B before C.
+
+.. _ReqEngManagementTool:
+
+Custom Requirements Management Tool
+-----------------------------------
+
+Since no requirements management tool was available that fits the need of the
+RTEMS Qualification Project. The decision was to develop a custom requirements
+management tool written in Python 3.6 or later. The design for it is heavily
+inspired by Doorstop.
--
2.26.2
More information about the devel
mailing list