[PATCH v3 03/10] bsps: Break out AArch32 portions of GPT driver
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Mon Oct 5 12:28:18 UTC 2020
On 05/10/2020 14:22, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:59 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2020 06:18, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> b/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> > index 5fb07bf60a..ff4b204790 100644
> > --- a/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> > +++ b/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <bsp/fdt.h>
> > #include <bsp/irq-generic.h>
> > #include <bsp/linker-symbols.h>
> > +#include <dev/clock/arm-generic-timer.h>
> >
> > #include <libfdt.h>
> >
> > @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ uint32_t bsp_fdt_map_intr(const uint32_t
> *intr, size_t icells)
> > return intr[1] + MAGIC_IRQ_OFFSET;
> > }
> >
> > -void arm_generic_timer_get_config(
> > +void aarch_generic_timer_get_config(
> Why did the function name change? The header file name starts also
> with
> arm and not aarch.
>
>
> ARM uses the terms aarch32 and aarch64 so it does make sense to
> refer bits and bobs as aarch.
I am not really fond of using aarch32 for existing stuff which already
had an arm prefix. I would use "arm" for shared stuff and the 32-bit
ARM. I would use "aarch64" for the 64-bit stuff.
More information about the devel
mailing list