[PATCH] rtems: Improve RTEMS_NO_RETURN attribute

Joel Sherrill joel at rtems.org
Tue Oct 6 15:34:14 UTC 2020

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:46 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> On 06/10/2020 16:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > How does it break the API? It looks like a change of annotation.
> > Shouldn't be a big deal unless I am misunderstanding something.
> Please have a look at:
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-October/062577.html

Looks like basically the same code. What does this break? Why the concern?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201006/c170b989/attachment.html>

More information about the devel mailing list