Fwd: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2020-10-13 09:15:22: Profile(s): everything

[Joel Sherrill]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 11:13 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

>
> On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >     > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
> >     > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> >     <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
> >     > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> >     <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
> >     >     It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
> >     related to
> >     > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose
> >     that will
> >     > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
> >     >
> >     > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you
> >     removed?
> >     We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why
> >     don't
> >     we record the tier status in the BSP items?
> >
> >
> > That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.
> >
> > Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a
> > ticket for it.
>
> I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system:
>
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449
>
> Why does this work?
>

What do you mean? The bsps are gone but still in the tiers list so
attempted. They fail to build as expected. You just missed references to
them in the tools

I just posted a patch.

>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201014/702ab1b4/attachment-0001.html>