Fwd: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2020-10-13 09:15:22: Profile(s): everything
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Oct 14 16:13:26 UTC 2020
On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
> > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
> >
> > On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
> > It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
> >
> >
> > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
> related to
> > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose
> that will
> > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
> >
> > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you
> removed?
> We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why
> don't
> we record the tier status in the BSP items?
>
>
> That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.
>
> Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a
> ticket for it.
I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449
Why does this work?
More information about the devel
mailing list