Fwd: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2020-10-13 09:15:22: Profile(s): everything

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Oct 14 16:13:26 UTC 2020


On 14/10/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber 
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de 
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
>     On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>     > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
>     > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>     <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
>     > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>     <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>     >
>     >     > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
>     >     It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
>     >
>     >
>     > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
>     related to
>     > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose
>     that will
>     > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
>     >
>     > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you
>     removed?
>     We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why
>     don't
>     we record the tier status in the BSP items?
>
>
> That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.
>
> Can you just fix this for now? It builds with autoconf and there is a 
> ticket for it.

I removed the BSPs a while ago also in the old build system:

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/?qt=range&q=70b803b5549016ab1ca12816e862217b8198e449

Why does this work?



More information about the devel mailing list