Fwd: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2020-10-13 09:15:22: Profile(s): everything
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Thu Oct 15 06:15:06 UTC 2020
On 15/10/2020 08:05, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 15/10/20 4:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 15/10/2020 00:48, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/10/20 2:27 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Sebastian Huber
>>>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> On 14/10/2020 17:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Huber
>>>> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>>> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
>>>> > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>>> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>>> wrote:
>>>> > On 14/10/2020 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > BSP builder has 81 failures. :(
>>>> > It tried to build BSPs which no longer exist.
>>>> >
>>>> > Well that is an easier thing to fix than my concern that it was
>>>> related to
>>>> > giving errors when a BSP does not support a feature. I suppose that will
>>>> > show up when the bsp builder switches to waf.
>>>> >
>>>> > Can you patch ./config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini to reflect what you removed?
>>>> We should try try to reduce the redundancy in our data sets. Why don't
>>>> we record the tier status in the BSP items?
>>>>
>>>> That's a Chris discussion when the builder is switched to using waf.
>>> The current data is in rtems-tools.git/config. I needed a spot and could not
>>> think of another place that was easy and low impact. I would welcome
>>> alternatives. If this data can be generated and updated or runtime loaded from
>>> another source, ie spec files, I would welcome this.
>>>
>>> The current blocker with the spec files is being able to use some shared code to
>>> parse and load the YAML data plus being able to load the data quickly. Waf has
>>> the loading code in the wscript file so that cannot be easily shared and it uses
>>> saved pickled data which I do not think is shareable.
>> We have a couple of options to re-use the build specification items. In general,
>> the Python module to work with these items outside the wscript is in rtems-central:
>>
>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/rtemsspec/items.py
> How long does this code take to load the build spec files in rtems.git?
>
It uses an item cache in pickle format. If you start with an empty cache
it needs a couple of seconds. Once the cache is set up it loads in less
than half a second.
More information about the devel
mailing list