AW: AW: [PATCH 1/3] Remove duplicate GRETH driver
Gabriel.Moyano at dlr.de
Gabriel.Moyano at dlr.de
Wed Oct 28 12:57:06 UTC 2020
>>>>> Hi Jiri,
>>>>>
>>>>> My understanding was that one driver version was meant to be used
>>>>> with
>>> drvmgr (greth.c) and the other without it (greth2.c). May I ask why
>>> do you've chosen to remove greth.c and not greth2.c?
>>>
>>> I have fixed-up the greth.c file to avoid inline SPARC assembly code,
>>> but the file is not used even when RTEMS is compiled with
>>> --enable-drvmgr. The problem is that both greth2.c and greth.c are
>>> compiled, and as they define the same symbols, greth2.c is pulled in
>>> first by chance.
I think the symbols of greth.c are linked into the final binary when CONFIGURE_DRIVER_AMBAPP_GAISLER_GRETH is defined (drvmgr_confdefs.h).
I hope this helps
>>>I need to disable the building of the network files
>>> in bsps/shared/shared-sources.am when -- enable-drvmgr is defined.
>>> Does anyone know how to do this? My skills in m4 etc. are limited ...
>>> :-(
>>>
>> If 99% of the code are the same, would it be an option to have just one driver implementation and in the drvmgr just use a wrapper for the driver?
>This is my idea to, but the driver manager code is sprinkled out in the file so it might take quite a few >ifdefs to fix. In any case, I still need to fix the m4 macros to detect if driver manager is defined or not ...
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>>> The problem I had was that greth.c contains SPARC assembly code and
>>>> cannot be built on any other architecture. I will change my patch to
>>>> disable greth.c on non-SPARC targets or try to replace the asssembly
>>>> code with macros as in greth2.c. Thanks for the feedback!
>>>>
>>>> An other issue is that the two files are 99% identical, but only
>>>> greth,c seems to be maintained. PHY handling and multi-cast support
>>>> are areas where the files have diverged. But this is an other discussion ...
More information about the devel
mailing list