Strong APA scheduler testing

[Gedare Bloom]

Start at the end and work your way back.

The clean version reports:
Passed:        636
Failed:          1
User Input:      6
Expected Fail:   1
Indeterminate:   0
Benchmark:       3
Timeout:         3
Invalid:         5
Wrong Version:   1
Wrong Build:     0
Wrong Tools:     0
------------------
Total:         656


Your version reports:
Passed:        600
Failed:         22
User Input:      6
Expected Fail:   1
Indeterminate:   0
Benchmark:       3
Timeout:        16
Invalid:         6
Wrong Version:   0
Wrong Build:     0
Wrong Tools:     0
------------------
Total:         654

You'll want to poke at those failures first and triage them. Fixing
one may cascade to other tests, so rerun the testsuite after you try a
fix.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached the log of rtems-test with the "clean" version (Commit: 61ccb9c05d (HEAD, tag: 5.1, origin/5) bsp/xilinx-zynq: Flush TX-Buffer before initializing uar) vs my Strong APA changes (with name log_leon3_sis_strong_apa).
>
> I haven't looked at the log in detail yet, but please let me know if there's anything odd that sparks interest.
>
> Thanks,
> Richi.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel