Strong APA scheduler testing

[Richi Dubey]

Understood. I'm on it. I'll try to debug the scheduler related tests first
i.e SMP tests if there are errors in them.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:30 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> Start at the end and work your way back.
>
> The clean version reports:
> Passed:        636
> Failed:          1
> User Input:      6
> Expected Fail:   1
> Indeterminate:   0
> Benchmark:       3
> Timeout:         3
> Invalid:         5
> Wrong Version:   1
> Wrong Build:     0
> Wrong Tools:     0
> ------------------
> Total:         656
>
>
> Your version reports:
> Passed:        600
> Failed:         22
> User Input:      6
> Expected Fail:   1
> Indeterminate:   0
> Benchmark:       3
> Timeout:        16
> Invalid:         6
> Wrong Version:   0
> Wrong Build:     0
> Wrong Tools:     0
> ------------------
> Total:         654
>
> You'll want to poke at those failures first and triage them. Fixing
> one may cascade to other tests, so rerun the testsuite after you try a
> fix.
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please find attached the log of rtems-test with the "clean" version
> (Commit: 61ccb9c05d (HEAD, tag: 5.1, origin/5) bsp/xilinx-zynq: Flush
> TX-Buffer before initializing uar) vs my Strong APA changes (with name
> log_leon3_sis_strong_apa).
> >
> > I haven't looked at the log in detail yet, but please let me know if
> there's anything odd that sparks interest.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richi.
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200912/3e9bd458/attachment-0001.html>