[PATCH 0/4] Unused value Coverity issues

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Apr 6 20:04:11 UTC 2021

> On 7 Apr 2021, at 2:07 am, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> 1/3/4 are fine, fix 2 and resend the set, or resent 1/3/4 as a set now
> to ACK and send 2 separately later.

Can we please only post full revised patch sets?  I would like to comment on a patch here as well so creating and positing parts of sets makes that harder hard.


More information about the devel mailing list