[PATCH 0/4] Unused value Coverity issues
gedare at rtems.org
Tue Apr 6 21:37:10 UTC 2021
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:04 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> > On 7 Apr 2021, at 2:07 am, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> > 1/3/4 are fine, fix 2 and resend the set, or resent 1/3/4 as a set now
> > to ACK and send 2 separately later.
> Can we please only post full revised patch sets? I would like to comment on a patch here as well so creating and positing parts of sets makes that harder hard.
Yep.. I already asked him to do that, although it is a good point to
keep perhaps the entire set moving together through re-reviews.
More information about the devel