[PATCH v2] c-user: Add scheduler glossary terms

[Gedare Bloom]

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:22 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2021 16:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> > On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >>     +    foreign scheduler
> >>     +        An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
> >>     :term:`scheduler` which is not
> >>     +        an :term:`eligible scheduler`.
> >>     +
> >>
> >>
> >> Can we come up with an adjective other than foreign. The scheduler
> >> did not
> >> originate in a different way/place and is not fundamentally
> >> different. The best I
> >> have is "unassociated"
> > The "unassociated" would be fine for me as well. I would like to have
> > an adjective which fits and if you grep for it, you find the right
> > spots without a high false positive rate.
> What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested.
>
that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit.

> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel