[PATCH v2] c-user: Add scheduler glossary terms

[Peter Dufault]

> On Apr 13, 2021, at 11:23 , Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> 
>> What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested.
>> 
> that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit.
> 
> 
From reading the mailings this is in contrast to the "eligible scheduler". So "ineligible" is good.  That's based on the mailings and not the code.

Peter
-----------------
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering

This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210413/7a9bfeaf/attachment-0001.bin>