[PATCH v2] c-user: Add scheduler glossary terms

Peter Dufault dufault at hda.com
Tue Apr 13 20:27:16 UTC 2021

> On Apr 13, 2021, at 11:23 , Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>> What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested.
> that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit.
From reading the mailings this is in contrast to the "eligible scheduler". So "ineligible" is good.  That's based on the mailings and not the code.

Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering

This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210413/7a9bfeaf/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the devel mailing list