[PATCH v1] c-user: Add documentation for exception mapping
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Sun Apr 18 23:10:37 UTC 2021
On 16/4/21 11:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 16/04/2021 15:05, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's currently the case for non-aarch64 platforms. The test is set to
>> require aarch64 as a result.
>
> How do you get this information from the documentation?
>
> In case this is something which potentially every CPU port can implement, then
> the implementation interface should be in the _CPU_* scope. You may also add
> something like CPU_HAS_EXCEPTION_TO_SIGNAL_MAPPINGS_SUPPORT TRUE/FALSE.
>
I do not believe the interfaces are strong enough to be rolled out across a
number of architectures. I have raised this in the other thread. I think there
are competing uses for the exception resource.
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list