[PATCH] Updated tick implementation for HAL_GetTick

[Robin Müller]

It worked for me. Can you specify that? The overflow check would have to be
implemented by an upper layer, right?
I can adapt my former patch using the tick solution to do the
multiplication first if this is better.

Kind Regards
Robin

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 20:25, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> On 21/04/2021 19:30, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> > On 21/04/2021 11:00, Robin Müller wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, good to know. Do you think it's okay if my simpler
> >> implementation is used completely?
> >> Another option would be to use the simple function for the oscillator
> >> init functions (sth like a private HAL_GetTick_OscInit function).
> >> But maybe you have a better idea.
> > If the ticks base solution works it is all right. The HAL_GetTick() -
> > HAL_GetTick() (e.g. tick 0xffffabcd - tick 0x123) should return a
> > correct interval during a tick overflow.
> It should be 0x123 - 0xffffabcd.
>
> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210422/92892d61/attachment.html>