[PATCH] Updated tick implementation for HAL_GetTick

[Sebastian Huber]

On 22/04/2021 14:17, Robin Müller wrote:

> It worked for me. Can you specify that? The overflow check would have 
> to be implemented by an upper layer, right?
> I can adapt my former patch using the tick solution to do the 
> multiplication first if this is better.
If you call HAL_GetTick() when the clock tick is 0xffffabcd and then 
0x123 and you calculate the difference of the results, the value should 
be all right. I am not sure if this is the case if you calculate it by 
rtems_clock_get_ticks_since_boot() * 1000) / 
rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second()

-- 
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/