[PATCH 06/35] libfdt: Correct condition for reordering blocks

[Sebastian Huber]

From: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>

This condition uses bitwise OR but should be logical OR. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200615160033.87328-1-sjg at chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
index 524b520c84..93e4a2b563 100644
--- a/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
+++ b/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ int fdt_open_into(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
 			return struct_size;
 	}
 
-	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) |
+	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) ||
 	    !fdt_blocks_misordered_(fdt, mem_rsv_size, struct_size)) {
 		/* no further work necessary */
 		err = fdt_move(fdt, buf, bufsize);
-- 
2.31.1