[PATCH 06/41] rtems: Add rtems_interrupt_get_attributes()

[Gedare Bloom]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:07 PM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2021 20:00, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >> +  /**
> >> +   * @brief This member is true, if the interrupt vector may be enabled by
> >> +   *   rtems_interrupt_vector_enable(), otherwise it is false.
> >> +   *
> >> +   * When an interrupt vector may be enabled, this means that the enabled state
> >> +   * may be changed from disabled to enabled and from enabled to enabled.  The
> > s/may/might
> > It is more proper to say "might" when something "might not". "may" and
> > "can" are close synonyms, but "maybe" is closer to "might" in usage.
> > English is still terrible.
> >
>
> For the tests we need two variants. One (currently "can") for which it
> is certain that the operation is successful. Another one (currently
> "maybe") for which the the operation could be successful or unsatisfied.
>
> For the "may_be_triggered_by_message" I would like to express that
> messages can trigger the interrupt, however, there may be also other
> triggers like signals or software.
>
Ok, i think this use of "may" actually does cover the difference. It's
just subtle. I'm fine with it here.

> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/