[PATCH 20/41] sparc/irq: Implement new interrupt directives

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Wed Jul 21 19:04:21 UTC 2021


On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
> > this code...
>
> The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we
> can't test the extended interrupts. In production, you want tested code.
>

ok, thanks. My comments are all pretty minor, except for the
terminology issues of "cause" but that wording already exists. post
the v2 series, but I probably won't review it and you can check it in
if no one complains. It's up to you if you want to work a different
wording than "cause" -- I prefer "raise"


More information about the devel mailing list