[PATCH v2 1/1] bsps/i386: Update calibration of TSC to be more accurate
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Wed Jun 16 18:06:10 UTC 2021
Me too. Just needs separate tickets for 5 and 6 so the release notes are
generated correctly.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:51 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> I'm good with it for master and 5.
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Jan Sommer <jan.sommer at dlr.de> wrote:
> >
> > Closes #4455
> > ---
> > bsps/i386/pc386/clock/ckinit.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bsps/i386/pc386/clock/ckinit.c
> b/bsps/i386/pc386/clock/ckinit.c
> > index 09afe73cde..2df1818dd3 100644
> > --- a/bsps/i386/pc386/clock/ckinit.c
> > +++ b/bsps/i386/pc386/clock/ckinit.c
> > @@ -104,48 +104,60 @@ static uint32_t pc386_get_timecount_i8254(struct
> timecounter *tc)
> >
> > /*
> > * Calibrate CPU cycles per tick. Interrupts should be disabled.
> > + * Will also set the PIT, so call this before registering the
> > + * periodic timer for rtems tick generation
> > */
> > static void calibrate_tsc(void)
> > {
> > uint64_t begin_time;
> > - uint8_t then_lsb, then_msb, now_lsb, now_msb;
> > - uint32_t i;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * We just reset the timer, so we know we're at the beginning of a
> tick.
> > - */
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Count cycles. Watching the timer introduces a several microsecond
> > - * uncertaintity, so let it cook for a while and divide by the number
> of
> > - * ticks actually executed.
> > - */
> > + uint8_t lsb, msb;
> > + uint32_t max_timer_value;
> > + uint32_t last_tick, cur_tick;
> > + int32_t diff, remaining;
> > +
> > + /* Set the timer to free running mode */
> > + outport_byte(TIMER_MODE, TIMER_SEL0 | TIMER_16BIT | TIMER_INTTC);
> > + /* Reset the 16 timer reload value, first LSB, then MSB */
> > + outport_byte(TIMER_CNTR0, 0);
> > + outport_byte(TIMER_CNTR0, 0);
> > + /* We use the full 16 bit */
> > + max_timer_value = 0xffff;
> > + /* Calibrate for 1s, i.e. TIMER_TICK PIT ticks */
> > + remaining = TIMER_TICK;
> >
> > begin_time = rdtsc();
> > -
> > - for (i = rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second() * pc386_isrs_per_tick;
> > - i != 0; --i ) {
> > - /* We know we've just completed a tick when timer goes from low to
> high */
> > - then_lsb = then_msb = 0xff;
> > - do {
> > - READ_8254(now_lsb, now_msb);
> > - if ((then_msb < now_msb) ||
> > - ((then_msb == now_msb) && (then_lsb < now_lsb)))
> > - break;
> > - then_lsb = now_lsb;
> > - then_msb = now_msb;
> > - } while (1);
> > + READ_8254(lsb, msb);
> > + last_tick = (msb << 8) | lsb;
> > + while(remaining > 0) {
> > + READ_8254(lsb, msb);
> > + cur_tick = (msb << 8) | lsb;
> > + /* PIT counts down, so subtract cur from last */
> > + diff = last_tick - cur_tick;
> > + last_tick = cur_tick;
> > + if (diff < 0) {
> > + diff += max_timer_value;
> > + }
> > + remaining -= diff;
> > }
> >
> > pc586_tsc_frequency = rdtsc() - begin_time;
> >
> > #if 0
> > - printk( "CPU clock at %u MHz\n", (uint32_t)(pc586_tsc_frequency /
> 1000000));
> > + printk( "CPU clock at %u Hz\n", (uint32_t)(pc586_tsc_frequency ));
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > static void clockOn(void)
> > {
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * First calibrate the TSC. Do this every time we
> > + * turn the clock on in case the CPU clock speed has changed.
> > + */
> > + if ( x86_has_tsc() ) {
> > + calibrate_tsc();
> > + }
> > +
> > rtems_interrupt_lock_context lock_context;
> > pc386_isrs_per_tick = 1;
> > pc386_microseconds_per_isr =
> rtems_configuration_get_microseconds_per_tick();
> > @@ -171,13 +183,6 @@ static void clockOn(void)
> > rtems_interrupt_lock_release(&rtems_i386_i8254_access_lock,
> &lock_context);
> >
> > bsp_interrupt_vector_enable( BSP_PERIODIC_TIMER );
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Now calibrate cycles per tick. Do this every time we
> > - * turn the clock on in case the CPU clock speed has changed.
> > - */
> > - if ( x86_has_tsc() )
> > - calibrate_tsc();
> > }
> >
> > bool Clock_isr_enabled = false;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210616/58c3b733/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list