Standalone repository for libnetworking stack

[Chris Johns]

On 10/3/21 3:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:58 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:28 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijay at rtems.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijay at rtems.org> wrote:
>>> In this proposed set of patches, I have removed telnetd from RTEMS and
>>> have placed it in the net-legacy repo, it seems like libbsd uses
>>> telnetd as well. Do we want to keep it in RTEMS and remove it from the
>>> legacy net repo?  There are checks in for RTEMS_NETWORKING in telnetd,
>>> to add rtems_bsdnet.h, how do we want to deal with that? In the legacy
>>> repo, we can just remove these checks and let them build.
>>
>>
>> Move it and remove rtems networking conditional. Freezes it with legacy stack.
>>
>> Just my opinion
>>
> Is there a different telnetd in libbsd?

Yes ...

https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/rtemsbsd/telnetd

> The longer term pseudo-goal of being able to (potentially) build
> multiple networking stacks and pick which one to link against may also
> be a consideration at this stage.

Are there issues? If there are issues do we know what they are?

Chris