Standalone repository for libnetworking stack

[Vijay Kumar Banerjee]

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:56 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/3/21 3:51 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:58 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:28 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijay at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijay at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>> In this proposed set of patches, I have removed telnetd from RTEMS and
> >>> have placed it in the net-legacy repo, it seems like libbsd uses
> >>> telnetd as well. Do we want to keep it in RTEMS and remove it from the
> >>> legacy net repo?  There are checks in for RTEMS_NETWORKING in telnetd,
> >>> to add rtems_bsdnet.h, how do we want to deal with that? In the legacy
> >>> repo, we can just remove these checks and let them build.
> >>
> >>
> >> Move it and remove rtems networking conditional. Freezes it with legacy stack.
> >>
> >> Just my opinion
> >>
> > Is there a different telnetd in libbsd?
>
> Yes ...
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/tree/rtemsbsd/telnetd
>
This seems to include rtems/telnetd.h
Does the libbsd telnetd depend on the cpukit/telnetd?

> > The longer term pseudo-goal of being able to (potentially) build
> > multiple networking stacks and pick which one to link against may also
> > be a consideration at this stage.
>
> Are there issues? If there are issues do we know what they are?
>
> Chris