AW: AW: AW: [PATCH 00/27] Update kern_tc in rtems 5 for ntp support
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Nov 30 04:22:45 UTC 2021
On 29/11/21 11:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 24/11/2021 10:57, Gabriel.Moyano at dlr.de wrote:
>>>>>>> I am fine with this change being pushed to the 5 branch but I think it
>>>>>>> needs to built with the tier 1 archs (i386, powerpc, arm).
>>>>>> I could compile them for the BSPs of those archs.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it make sense to run some test in qemu?
>>>>> Test results are always welcome.
>>>>>
>>>> I've run the following tests:
>>>> - sptimecounter02, 03 and 04 are pass on pc686 and Xilinx_zynq_a9.
>>>> - sptimecounter01 doesn't print something since everything happens inside of
>>>> boot_card(). How the result of this test is verified?
>>> Re-run the test using rtems-test.
>>> - sptimecounter01, 02, 03 and 04 are marked as pass on Xilinx_zynq_a9 and psim
>>> - sptimecounter02, 03 and 04 are marked as pass on pc686
>>> - sptimecounter01 is marked as invalid on pc686. This result is with and
>>> without the patch set. I guess it is because nothing is printed
>>> out.
>>>
>>>> Are there any other tests that can be interested to run?
>>> If there isn't any other test to run, I would say that the patch set is ready.
>> After running the whole testsuite for pc686, xilinx_zynq_a9 and psim; there
>> are no new failures introduced.
>
> For me this is fine, what do you think Chris?
Sorry about the delay and being distracted .. a few deadlines.
Yes this looks fine.
I think Jan has commit access so if he could push this to the 5 branch it would
be appreciated.
Thanks
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list