[rtems commit] schedulerpriority.h: Fix gcc 12 warning

[Chris Johns]

On 29/8/22 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 19/08/2022 22:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Module:    rtems
>> Branch:    master
>> Commit:    5b875915152a248079855bcb98e871f70ac314cc
>> Changeset:
>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=5b875915152a248079855bcb98e871f70ac314cc
>>
>> Author:    Ryan Long <ryan.long at oarcorp.com>
>> Date:      Tue Aug 16 12:00:26 2022 -0500
>>
>> schedulerpriority.h: Fix gcc 12 warning
>>
>> Changed the size of the array to 1 to get rid of the warning.
>>
>> Updates #4662
>>
>> ---
>>
>>   cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h
>> b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h
>> index cf5d0762a9..e485e97c60 100644
>> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h
>> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>     /**
>>      * @brief One ready queue per priority level.
>>      */
>> -  Chain_Control Ready[ 0 ];
>> +  Chain_Control Ready[ 1 ];
>>   } Scheduler_priority_Context;
> 
> Increasing the storage size to fix a warning is the wrong approach.  The warning
> should be suppressed in the application configuration header or the
> configuration should be changed to account for the new chain control.

Why do you say this is right or a better approach?

Chris