[PATCH rtems-tools] tiers: Add AArch64 to tier 1

[Kinsey Moore]

On 1/19/2022 09:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 19/01/2022 15:42, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> On 1/18/2022 10:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>>>> Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
>>>>
>>>> Closes #4581
>>>
>>> It would be nice if you could run also the new validation tests on 
>>> this branch:
>>>
>>> https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=validation
>>>
>> It looks like when running with that branch, tar02 and psxftw01 are 
>> consistently failing with a PC in the stack since sometime after 
>> 68b0db358c81a7f770a44ceb819197bdc320bc99 which is what the other test 
>> run used. I'll have to track that down.
>
> Thanks for testing. It would be good to do a git bisect to figure out 
> the problem.
I'm currently doing that now and should have it narrowed down soon.
>
>>
>> ts-performance-no-clock-0 gets test-too-long, but passes with 
>> modified tester timeouts and all the other validation tests pass just 
>> fine.
>
> Great, did the ts-validation-intr test run also? It fails on my Qemu 
> simulator.
Yes, that test was included in the validation tests and passed.
>
> I think the issue with ts-performance-no-clock-0 is the size of the 
> data cache. However, the data cache is an important factor for the 
> performance data, so there is no way around this.
>
Good to know. We may want to bump up the default test-too-long limit if 
this is going to be the case.


Kinsey