GCC version for RTEMS 6?

Karel Gardas karel at functional.vision
Thu May 5 10:50:28 UTC 2022

On 5/5/22 11:35, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> I think this is a use case where something added to the RSB may be required to
>>> make this easier. For example logic in a bset file would be nice.
>> Your idea is excellent, but I think we also may need something more simple and
>> history preserving for the time releases are already done.
>> Hence I sent a patch series creating config/6.1 as a preparation for 6.1 release
>> with gcc 10 and update 6 (as a 6 branch dev) with Sebastian's updated GCC 12).
>> Just meant as material for discussion.
> I understand and thank you for contributing.
> A release is the tarfiles and that is fixed.

Just checked https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.1/ and you are 
right! I stand corrected, in this case indeed my patch series is useless.


More information about the devel mailing list