[PATCH] ISL, MPC, MPFR: fix configuration issues on ARM64/Darwin host

[Joel Sherrill]

On Tue, May 17, 2022, 6:39 AM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision> wrote:

> On 5/17/22 13:30, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 17/5/22 7:48 pm, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >> On 5/17/22 11:42, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>> On 17/5/22 4:14 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, May 16, 2022, 12:33 PM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision>
> wrote:
> >>>>> On 5/13/22 15:57, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>>>>> We do not put patches in RTEMS repos. File an rtems ticket, attach
> them,
> >>>>>> and reference them from there.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If they are needed upstream, please submit them to the appropriate
> >>>>> projects.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> based on the discussion I've created
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4657
> >>>>> -- hopefully this will be enough to accept interim solution and fix
> M1
> >>>>> compilation issues.
> >>>>> I'll follow the possible replies, links on their archives and link
> them
> >>>>> as go into the ticket for your reference.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Perfect! Just use the raw attachment url for them.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for sorting this out.
> >>
> >> Sure! You are welcome! But I guess now, ball is on your side.
> >
> > Sorry, I am not understanding what I need to do?
> >
> >> How will you proceed?
> >
> > ?
>
> Oh, I see there is a big misunderstanding here. When I submitted the
> patch with patches, Joel reacted and explained what to do. Perhaps I've
> interpreted the info badly, but my general impression was: do all this
> and then we will allow it for limited time -- we just need to have that
> tracked well.
> Recap: it really looks like it is needed only for RTEMS 6 and only for
> M1/Apple/Darwin and patches should not break anything at all, completely
> harmless for all other users...
>

I was ok with the patches and basic RSB changes. It was the location of the
patches on the internet that was the issue. Change the URIs to get the
patches from devel.rtems.org and all should be ok

The ticket can be closed when none of them need the patch. Perhaps a
comment above where each patch is added to point back to the PR would help
humans spot that.

--joel

>
> Thanks!
> Karel
>