bsp builder and versal ilp32

Joel Sherrill joel at rtems.org
Thu Sep 8 01:51:54 UTC 2022


On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 8:27 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 8/9/2022 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 4:47 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >     > Hi
> >     >
> >     > Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed?
> >     >
> >     > rtems-tools]$ grep -r ilp32 | grep versal
> >     > config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini:       xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu,
> >     > xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190,
> >     > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini:    xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu,
> >     xilinx_versal_lp64_qemu,
> >     > config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini:bsps_aarch64 =
> xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190,
> >
> >     Yes they do. Could the BSP builder ask `rtems-bsps` for the list
> these days?
> >     That would help avoid this issue.
> >
> > Yes. For "all" but not for the tiers. But all is what is used by the OAR
> > builders so that would be an improvement and avoid patches like this and
> the
> > next one which updates the RSB to use a new rtems-tools hash
>
> Could the tier status be added to the spec files and reported by
> rtems-bsps?
>

It's software. Anything is possible. Lol

It would be better stored in RTEMS and the rtems-bsps tool could then show
it

>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20220907/bd8d66e9/attachment.htm>


More information about the devel mailing list