[PATCH] tftpDriver.c: Fix Coverity issues
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Fri Sep 16 18:47:34 UTC 2022
I'm ok with this.
FYI Coverity Scans are limited to three times a day but a check for changes
runs more frequently to trigger them.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 1:13 PM Frank Kuehndel <
frank.kuehndel at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> From: Frank Kühndel <frank.kuehndel at embedded-brains.de>
>
> CID 1506523: Unchecked return value from library (CHECKED_RETURN)
> CID 1506522: Unchecked return value from library (CHECKED_RETURN)
> CID 1437618: Unchecked return value from library (CHECKED_RETURN)
>
> Close #4718
> ---
> cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c
> b/cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c
> index 59136ef59f..0246ed9611 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/ftpfs/tftpDriver.c
> @@ -525,8 +525,10 @@ static void send_error (
>
> /*
> * Send it
> + *
> + * Ignoring result because error packets are sent once and maybe lost.
> */
> - sendto (tp->socket, (char *)&msg, len, 0, (struct sockaddr *)to,
> sizeof *to);
> + (void) sendto (tp->socket, (char *)&msg, len, 0, (struct sockaddr
> *)to, sizeof *to);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -552,11 +554,21 @@ getPacket (struct tftpStream *tp, int retryCount)
> } else if (retryCount == 0) {
> tv.tv_sec = tp->config.first_timeout / 1000L;
> tv.tv_usec = (tp->config.first_timeout % 1000L) * 1000L;
> - setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof tv);
> + /*
> + * Ignoring result because all possible errors indicate wrong
> + * arguments and these arguments are OK as tested by test suite.
> + */
> + (void) setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv,
> + sizeof tv);
> } else {
> tv.tv_sec = tp->config.timeout / 1000L;
> tv.tv_usec = (tp->config.timeout % 1000L) * 1000L;
> - setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof tv);
> + /*
> + * Ignoring result because all possible errors indicate wrong
> + * arguments and these arguments are OK as tested by test suite.
> + */
> + (void) setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv,
> + sizeof tv);
> }
> for (;;) {
> union {
> @@ -591,7 +603,12 @@ getPacket (struct tftpStream *tp, int retryCount)
> if (retryCount != GET_PACKET_DONT_WAIT) {
> tv.tv_sec = 0;
> tv.tv_usec = 0;
> - setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof tv);
> + /*
> + * Ignoring result because all possible errors indicate wrong
> + * arguments and these arguments are OK as tested by test suite.
> + */
> + (void) setsockopt (tp->socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv,
> + sizeof tv);
> }
> return len;
> }
> @@ -724,7 +741,7 @@ static int process_data_packet (struct tftpStream *tp,
> ssize_t len)
> /*
> * Send it. Errors during send will not matter for this last ACK.
> */
> - sendto (
> + (void) sendto (
> tp->socket,
> send_buf,
> plen,
> --
> 2.35.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20220916/e813238f/attachment.htm>
More information about the devel
mailing list