[PATCH] c-user: Add application config info directives
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Fri Sep 23 07:04:56 UTC 2022
On 23.09.22 08:55, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Do we want a single chapter with all Classic API types?
>>
>> Do we want a section per manager for the types?
>>
>> Which types should be documented?
>>
>> I would document them in a single chapter and only structs.
>
> There are 2 cases in relation to this thread and patch. Having something
> documented with the macro that is the right type and then a simple means
> to step from a specific function/macro to the fields if a struct. Does
> this make sense?
The types can be fixed by using an inline function instead of a macro.
For directives which need a macro implementation, we could add an
additional real function just like for rtems_build_name().
>
> I have not consider any more so I am not sure how we handle all the
> types. Maybe Joel or Gedare do. 😄
The missing types documentation is also relevant to other functions, for
example:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/task/directives.html#rtems-task-construct
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
More information about the devel
mailing list