warnings report on builder wrong?
Karel Gardas
karel at functional.vision
Sun Feb 12 21:37:11 UTC 2023
Hello,
looking into the last bsp-builder report here:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2023-February/041799.html
and I'm surprised by the fact that beaglebonewhile shows 0 warnings
while I remember well to fix 3 warnings this weekend.
I even rerun build just a minute ago and they are still here in full glory:
In file included from ../../../bsps/arm/beagle/start/bspstart.c:41:
../../../bsps/arm/beagle/start/bspstart.c: In function
'beagle_get_node_unit':
../../../bsps/arm/beagle/start/bspstart.c:124:26: warning: array
subscript has type 'char' [-Wchar-subscripts]
124 | if (!isdigit(prop[i]))
| ~~~~^~~
In file included from ../../../bsps/arm/beagle/pwmss/pwmss.c:38:
../../../bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp.h: In function
'pwmss_module_clk_config':
../../../bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp.h:66:16: warning: 'clkctrl' may be
used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
66 | #define REG(x)(*((volatile uint32_t *)(x)))
| ^
../../../bsps/arm/beagle/pwmss/pwmss.c:59:14: note: 'clkctrl' was
declared here
59 | uint32_t clkctrl;
| ^~~~~~~
So, why is that builder does not report those? This is default
beaglebonewhite configuration so it should be pretty close to what
builder builds. Also the toolchain is 6/rtems-arm build last week...
Thanks,
Karel
More information about the devel
mailing list